With the announcement that newly-appointed Cleveland Browns head coach Hue Jackson will call his own plays, a review of the 2014-2015 Cincinnati Bengals’ offense provides a potential template of what fans can expect next season. A review of the tape shows several tried-and-true run and pass-game concepts Jackson leans on to move the ball. Building off my previous post (Counter/Power), I want to continue looking at base run concepts the new play-caller ran last season.
Although Jackson is well-known for running a gap-based scheme (Iso, Counter, Power), a look at the game tape shows several zone-based concepts including tight zone, split zone, and outside zone. Today I want to break down a clever variant of outside zone that I’ve observed several times through six games, the Pin-and-Pull.
With the announcement that head coach Hue Jackson will call his own plays, All-22 film provides a wealth of knowledge and insight into what to expect from the 2016 Cleveland Browns’ offense. Several base concepts that Jackson leans on in the pass and run game jump out of the game tape immediately. A popular run-game concept executed at all levels of football (and Hue Jackson favorite) that we can expect to see next season is good old-fashioned ‘Power’.
Before getting into the details of the play, let’s look at the world famous ‘Power’ concept. The play falls under the ‘power’ run game umbrella, as it is gap-blocked, requiring offensive linemen to both down block and pull.
The running back will take a hard step away from the play’s direction to allow the pulling guard to cross his face, with the added bonus of often causing hesitation by pulling linebackers away from the ball as they read the tailback for run flow.
Mark Richt has run a highly successful shallow cross series since his days as Florida State’s offensive coordinator in the mid-late 90’s. He brought the play to Georgia and continues to run it to this day. I love the play concept; I REALLY hope Flip brings it with him.
Here’s a diagram of the play straight from FSU’s playbook:
Click here for a look at some All 22 film of the concept. You’ll also see Richt’s Y-Corner, Y-Stick, and Sail concepts.
At this point we all know that the Raider’s offense ran a fairly WCO-ish scheme, with LOTS of ball going to the RB/FB out of the backfield. We’ll look at some common short/intermediate route concepts the offense utilized last year, as well as their base running game (IZ/OZ, power, and the counter), but today I want to breakdown my favorite vertical concepts the switch combo. I choose this particular play for two reasons: I’m a switch route fan boi and the play design is very clever as all 4 routes work together to achieve multiple goals against multiple defensive shells. Not a single route is “wasted”.
Be sure to check out the The Orange and Brown Report for the best Cleveland Browns insider information, X’s & O’s, and football discussion!
The single greatest question about Cal (and possible Browns’ target) quarterback Jared Goff revolves around his college offense, Sonny Dyke’s “Bear Raid” system. With few success stories to point to over the previous two decades, the ability of an Airraid college quarterback to effectively run an ‘NFL’ progression-based offense should certainly be a major consideration when Cleveland’s new front office evaluates potential quarterback fits.
What’s the difference between a read and progression? Is there a single accepted definition or will we find shades of gray? Let’s start by examining two plays from the 2014 season to differentiate between “progression” reads and “coverage” reads.
Before going any further you should read this outstanding article by Chris Brown of SmartFootball.com explaining the key differences, as well as strengths and weaknesses, of progression and coverage reads. He does a great job of explaining the concepts. Keep in mind that progression reads are often associated with “pro” style offenses and coverage reads are often generally associated with “college” offenses such as the Spread/Airraid.
If you don’t want to read the article (really you SHOULD read it; Chris does phenomenal film work) I’ll quickly rehash what is said. Progression reads are sequential (1st option, 2nd option, 3rd option……) while coverage reads generally focus on the action of a single defender (the action of a Cover 2 squat corner determines where the ball goes when running the popular “Smash” concept).
Progression reads generally require more intensive verbiage and emphasis on the timing of the routes with the QB’s drop. In addition progression reads generally have MANY more site adjustments then coverage reads.
Progression reads do not often utilize “mirrored” route concepts, or two-man route concepts to both sides of the field (slant/flat for example). When you hear about “half-field reads”, the offense is generally running a mirrored concept to each side of the field. Pre-snap the QB will choose which side of the field to target based on a variety of factors including coverage shell, defender’s leverage and depth, spacing (field/boundary), personnel match-ups, etc.
Often times the coaches’ box will determine where the ball is going after scanning the defense at the LOS. This is one of the primary reasons many offenses hurry to the LOS. The offensive coaches want to scan the defense, looking for play opportunities based on coverage, alignment, depth, and match-ups.